Directions and trends in management theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51660/ridhs22332Keywords:
reengineering, benchmarking, outsourcing, management theories, enterprise managementAbstract
The article analyzes the significance of classical management theories in the context of dynamic changes in the modern economy, emphasizing their impact on current managerial practices. The research uses a critical literature review to understand the role of key figures in classical management, such as Robert Owen, Charles Babbage, and Frederick W. Taylor, and their contribution to the organization of work and the effectiveness of enterprises. The evolution of managerial thought is presented, including classical management theories, such as the theory of interpersonal relations and quantitative theories. Contemporary integrative approaches, such as systemic and situational theories, are also identified, which allow for better adaptation of management methods to changing market realities. The research indicates that despite the passage of time, classical theories still constitute the foundation for contemporary management concepts, such as reengineering, benchmarking, outsourcing, and lean management. It also indicates the need for further analysis of these theories in the context of new technologies and innovations and their adaptation to digitalization. The conclusions drawn from the undertaken subject show that classical management theories have a significant impact on the effectiveness of modern organizations. Their development should be continued to adapt to the challenges resulting from technological progress and changes in the market environment.
Downloads
References
Adamska-Chudzińska, M. (2020). Employee retention management in the context of situational leadership. Social Inequalities and Economic Growth, 62(2).
Arslan, A., & Staub, S. (2013). Theory X and Theory Y type leadership behavior and its impact on organizational performance: Small business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 102–111.
Babbage, C. (2009). On the economy of machinery and manufactures. Cambridge University Press.
Bacud, S. A. D. (2020). Henri Fayol's principles of management and its effect on organizational leadership and governance. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(1), 247–252.
Bajjou, M. S., Chafi, A., & Ennadi, A. (2017). A comparative study between lean construction and the traditional production system. International Journal of Engineering Research, 29, 178–187.
Baloch, A. (2019). Management theories: The contribution of contemporary management theorists in tackling contemporary management challenges (Nr. 14). University of Wales Trinity Saint David.
Beveridge, A. J. (2014). Private business to public service: Robert McNamara’s management techniques and their limits in peace and war (Doctoral dissertation). Johns Hopkins University.
Bramel, D., & Friend, R. (1981). Hawthorne, the myth of the docile worker, and class bias in psychology. American Psychologist, 36(8), 867–878.
Chiesa, M., & Hobbs, S. (2008). Making sense of social research: How useful is the Hawthorne effect? European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 67–74.
Christiansen, B., & Chandan, H. C. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of research on organizational culture and diversity in the modern workforce. IGI Global.
Corbett, M. F. (2004). Outsourcing revolution: Why it makes sense and how to do it right. Dearborn Trade.
Dad, A. M. (2013). Outsourcing: A review of trends. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(8), 91–98.
Daryani, S. M. (2012). Organizational theory, systemic thinking and system management. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 1(2), 50–58.
Digha, M. N. (2014). Morgan’s images of organizations analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. HarperCollins.
Duncan, D. J. (1971). Sociological and social-psychological factors related to success in business management (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University.
Eversheim, W., Baumann, M., Linnhoff, M., Humburger, R., Hedrich, P., & van de Löcht, G. (1993). Reducing costs in production through outsourcing. Management Journal, 10(1), 45–52.
Fredriksson, A. (2011). Materials supply and production outsourcing (Doctoral dissertation). Chalmers University of Technology.
Fritze, C. (2016). The key elements and the role of Kaizen within the system. The Toyota Production System Journal, 3(1), 15–25.
Fuser, K. (1999). Modern management. DTV.
Goncharuk, A. G., Lazareva, N. O., & Alsharf, I. A. M. (2015). Benchmarking as a performance management method. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 11(2), 41–52.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. A. (1995). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. Nicholas Brealey.
Hässig, K. (1994). Zeit als Wettbewerbsstrategie (Time-based management). Die Unternehmung, 48(4), 213–220.
Hodgetts, R. M., & Greenwood, R. (1995). Frederick Taylor: Alive and well and ready for the 21st century. In D. Moore (Ed.), Management classics (pp. 55–68). Omnipress.
Jakubiec, M., & Brodnick, E. (2016). Kaizen concept in the process of a quality improvement in the company. ATH.
Jedynak, P. (2015). Lean management implementation: Determinant factors and experience. Jagiellonian Journal of Management, 1(1), 67–78.
Karim, A., & Arif-Uz-Zaman, K. (2013). A methodology for effective implementation of lean strategies and its performance evaluation in manufacturing organizations. Business Process Management Journal, 19(1), 169–196.
Kobyłecka, K. (2007). Jakość po japońsku. Ogólnopolski Przegląd Medyczny, 5, 33–36.
Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1995). Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. Guilford Press.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Harvard University Press.
Luthans, F., & Stewart, T. I. (1977). A general contingency theory of management. University of Nebraska.
Mădălina, O. (2016). Conflict management, a new challenge. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 807–814.
Malik, N. (2009). Emergence of strategic human resource management historical perspective. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 7(1), Article 16.
Martyniak, Z. (1996). Methods of organizing work processes. PWE.
Mason-Jones, R., & Towill, D. R. (1999). Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 61–73.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
McNamara, D. (2009). From Fayol's mechanistic to today's organic functions. American Journal of Business Education, 2(1), 63–78.
Meade, P. H. (2007). A guide to benchmarking. Curtin University of Technology.
Nelson, D. (1992). Scientific management and the transformation of university business education. In D. Nelson (Ed.), A mental revolution: Scientific management since Taylor (pp. 77–101). Ohio State University Press.
Oczkowska, R. (2012). Offshoring as an opportunity to use global human capital resources. EU.
Onday, O. (2016a). Classical to modern organization theory. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(2), 87–105.
Onday, O. (2016b). Neoclassical organization theory. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(1), 95–110.
Owen, R. (1948). Wybór pism. KiW.
Pal, K. (2011). Management concepts and organizational behavior. Maharshi Dayanand University.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Watrous, K. M. (1995). The concept of W. F. Taylor. Texas A&M University.
Pieske, R. (1994). Benchmarking: Das Lernen von anderen und seine Begrenzungen. Management Zeitschrift, 6(3), 144–150.
Pindur, W., & Rogers, S. E. (1994). The history of management: A global perspective. College of Business and Public Administration.
Procter & Gamble. (2010). Annual report 2010.
Rahman, S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods. School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work.
Sapkauskiene, A., & Leitoniene, S. (2010). The concept of time-based competition in the context of management theory. Engineering Economics, 21(2), 145–153.
Savage, S. P. (1981). The theories of Talcott Parsons. Macmillan.
Schein, E. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide. Jossey-Bass.
Sherman, H. (1966). It all depends: A pragmatic approach to organization. University of Alabama Press.
Siméon, O. (2012). Robert Owen: The father of British socialism? Books and Ideas. Collège de France.
Sorenson, V. (1964). Report of workgroup relation between managerial goals and values and market behaviour and structure (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University.
Stadelmann, M., & Lux, W. (1995). Hot topics oder kalter Kaffee? Management Zeitschrift, 3(2), 77–88.
Staehle, W. H. (1976). Situational approach to management. Management International Review, 16(3), 112–128.
Szarecki, A. (2012). Ciało i władza w kulturze korporacyjnej. University of Warsaw.
Thomas, C., & Weber, M. (2006). Talcott Parsons and the sociology of legal reform: A reassessment with implications for law and development. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 15(1), 33–57.
Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Prentice Hall.
Trocki, M. (2001). Outsourcing: Metoda restrukturyzacji działalności gospodarczej. PWE.
Turan, H. (2015). Taylor’s scientific management principles: Contemporary issues in personnel selection period. Journal of Business and Management, 3(11), 67–74.
Vakola, M. (1999). Business process reengineering and organisational change: Evaluation of implementation strategies(Doctoral dissertation). University of Salford.
Waddell, D., Jones, G. R., & George, J. (2013). Contemporary management. McGraw-Hill.
Wee, H. M., & Wu, S. (2009). Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: A case study on Ford Motor Company. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(5), 335–348.
Worley, J. M., & Doolen, T. L. (2006). The role of communication and management support in a lean manufacturing implementation. Management Decision, 44(2), 228–245.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Human Development and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles are published under the terms of a licence that permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Ed&TIC retains the proprietary rights to the published works and actively promotes the reuse of these works under the terms of the aforementioned licence, which encourages the dissemination of knowledge and collaboration in the academic community.
