Ethical application in nowadays politics: the relationship of opposites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51660/riftp.v4i1.88Keywords:
ethics, autonomous ethics, politics, pragmatic politics, morality, amoral political practiceAbstract
When applying ethics in politics, a fundamental consistent problem between their supposed relationship is revealed, coming to be understood as opposed knowledge, it is necessary, therefore, to reflect on its possible application, or if, on the contrary, ethically normalize politics is impossible, using the help of analytical, deductive and historical-comparative methods that serve as a theoretical framework. Due to the denial of ethics in political procedures, an amoral political practice arises, which through submission and custom ends up being accepted as something politically normal, degenerating into a series of problems and beliefs that make it increasingly impossible to apply moral judgments to political actions, which is why today it is normal to think that the only important thing in politics is only the end, ignoring the damage that can be generated in the process. However, ethics and politics are human actions, therefore one must reflect on them with the tools provided by political ethics, applying ethical and moral judgments to the immediate and practical actions found in politics.
Downloads
References
Alfaro, R. M. (2005). Ética en el ambito de la política. CIELAC, IDEHU, UPOLI.
Arendt, H. (1997). ¿Qué es política? Paidós.
Aristóteles. (2016). Ética a Nicómaco (Azcárate, P.D. trad. en 1873.). Editorial Digital Imprenta Nacional. (Original publicado en 349 a.C)
Ázocar, P. A. (1991). Ética y Política. Editorial Andrés Bello.
Bombardeos Atómicos en Hiroshima y Nagasaki. (11 de agosto de 2023).
Cortina, A. (2013). ¿Para que sirve realmente la ética? Paidós.
Fajardo, A. M. (2022). De la filosofía moral popular a la metafísica de las costumbres. En RIFTP, Revista Internacional de Filosofía Teórica y Práctica (págs. 193-205). Revista Internacional de Filosofía Teórica y Práctica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51660/riftp.v2i1.49
Kant, I. (2005). Fundamentación de la Metafísica de las Costumbres (Cortina, A. y Conill, J. trad.). Editorial Tecnos. (Original publicado en 1785)
Malishev, M. (2014). Kant: ética del imperativo categórico. En La Colmena, La Colmena 84 (págs. 9-21). La Colmena.
Maquiavelo, N. (1999). El Principe (eladeph,com. ed.) (Original publicado en 1532)
Meza, R. B. (2000). Ética y Política. En R. d. Política, Estudios Políticos (págs. 135-146). Revistas UNAM.
Platón. (1872). El Político (Azcárate, P. D. trad.). Medina y Navarro. (Original publicado entre 367 y 360 a.C)
Rosales, S. (1980). Antología. Editorial Universitaria.
Smilde, K. (s.f.). ¿Qué es el Holocausto?
Tenorio, G. Á. (2016). Ética y Política: para tiempos violentos. DCSH.
Torbio, R. D. (1981). Pensamiento Político de Maquiavelo. En Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo, Ciencia y Sociedad (págs. 67-77). Dialnet. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.1981.v6i1.pp67-77
Vázquez, A. S. (1984). Ética. Editorial Crítica.
Vázquez, A. S. (2003). Ética y Política. En A. A. Boron, Filosofía Política Contemporánea. Sobre Civilización, Imperio y Ciudadanía (págs. 277-284). Clacso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Internacional de Filosofía Teórica y Práctica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles are published under the terms of a licence that permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. Ed&TIC retains the proprietary rights to the published works and actively promotes the reuse of these works under the terms of the aforementioned licence, which encourages the dissemination of knowledge and collaboration in the academic community.